AI Agents
All insights

Case

Case: from 1,000 screening calls a month to 1,000 an hour with an AI interviewer

A high-volume employer replaced first-round phone screening with a voice AI interviewer built on Reclutalia. Throughput up 720x, every call transcribed and scored into the ATS, recruiters back to deciding.

Sarah Mousa

Content and Proof Ledger

5 min read
Candidates with folders waiting in a corporate lobby on a mass hiring day

A high-volume employer in México replaced its first-round phone screening with a voice AI interviewer built on Reclutalia, the recruiting product of DaCodes. Throughput went from about 1,000 calls a month to about 1,000 calls an hour, a 720x increase, with every call transcribed, scored and written to the ATS. The client is anonymized; the figures are from the DaCodes Proof Ledger (Sep 2026).

The situation

Mass hiring has a math problem. When a company needs hundreds of frontline hires a month, the first phone screen is the bottleneck: a recruiter makes a few dozen calls a day, many go unanswered, and the candidate who finally picks up has already accepted another job. The funnel is lost at the top, and the recruiters spend their week dialing instead of deciding.

What we signed

Primary KPI: screening throughput, measured as completed first-round interviews per hour of capacity. Guardrail: recruiter agreement with the agent's score on a sampled set of interviews, reviewed weekly. Consequence: if the throughput target set at Blueprint was not met at the commitment gate, no Scale phase and no retainer.

What the interviewer does

  • Receives: a candidate applies or is imported; the agent calls in the window the candidate chose, by phone or WhatsApp.
  • Looks up: the role's requirements, the location, the shift and the documents needed, from the ATS.
  • Decides: which question to ask next based on the answers, when to probe, when to end early because a hard requirement is missing.
  • Acts: writes the transcript, a structured score and a recommendation to the ATS, and books the in-person interview for candidates who pass.
  • Escalates: unclear answers, accessibility needs or a candidate who asks for a person go to a recruiter with the full context.
  • Learns: recruiters correct scores in the ATS; the corrections feed the weekly evals.
Channels the interviewer calls on
  • Voice

The voice stack that makes the volume affordable

A thousand calls an hour is only interesting if each call is cheap. The interviewer runs on the DaCodes voice stack, speech recognition, an open-weights language model and speech synthesis hosted in the client's cloud, at about $0.035 per 15-minute call, measured internally in August 2026, against $2.56 to $5.17 per call on commercial voice APIs. At mass-hiring volume, the difference is the budget.

Results

  • Throughput: about 1,000 screening calls a month to about 1,000 an hour, 720x (Proof Ledger, Sep 2026).
  • Every call transcribed, scored and written to the ATS; no recruiter retyping.
  • Recruiters moved from dialing to reviewing shortlists and running final interviews.

Source: the client's ATS and call logs, verified in the DaCodes Proof Ledger, Sep 2026.

720x

screening throughput

Proof Ledger, Sep 2026

1,000

calls an hour, from 1,000 a month

Proof Ledger, Sep 2026

$0.035

per 15-minute call on the DaCodes voice stack

DaCodes, Aug 2026

What the recruiting team sees

In the ATS, every candidate carries the transcript, the structured score against the role rubric and the recommendation. On the Agent Console, the recruiting lead sees completed calls per hour against the target, the recruiter agreement rate from the weekly sample, spend this month and the audit trail of every call. An override takes one click and is logged as eval data, so the rubric improves from the corrections instead of drifting away from them.

What we watched for

Screening candidates with AI raises fair questions, and we treated them as design constraints. The agent asks the same structured questions to every candidate for a role. It never makes the hiring decision; it produces a score and a recommendation a recruiter can override in one click. Candidates are told they are speaking with an AI interviewer and can ask for a person at any point. Personal data stays in the client's tenant, and the scoring rubric is versioned so a recruiter can see why a score changed.

The hardest part was not the reasoning

It was the audio. Candidates for frontline roles answer from the street, the bus and the store floor. The first evals were dominated by transcription errors, not by bad questions. Tuning the speech layer for noisy audio and adding a confirm-back step for names, dates and documents took most of the first sprint. Both are now part of the reference architecture every new deployment starts from.

What happens next

The same interviewer is a Library agent. For a new client it needs 2 to 4 weeks of tuning inside the pilot: role rubrics, tone, the ATS integration. The pilot itself reaches production in 8 to 12 weeks, with its own KPI Contract.

A thousand calls an hour is only interesting if each call is cheap.
caserecruitingvoicereclutalia

Sarah Mousa

Content and Proof Ledger

5 min read

Insights

Related articles

A woman checking her banking app at a crosswalk on Reforma in Mexico City

$6.40$0.85

cost per resolved tier 1 ticket, USD · Proof Ledger, Sep 2026

Case

Case: a fintech in México cut cost per ticket from $6.40 to $0.85 in 12 weeks

Tier 1 support moved to an enterprise agent on WhatsApp and web chat connected to the core. Cost per resolved ticket from $6.40 to $0.85 USD and NPS from 42 to 71. Client anonymized; figures verified in the Proof Ledger.

Sarah Mousa

Content and Proof Ledger

5 min read
A telephone handset resting on printed telephony billing reports, one column highlighted, in an empty contact center in Monterrey at dawn
Insights

What a voice agent costs in 2026 (and why ours costs $0.035 per call)

A 15-minute call costs $2.56 to $5.17 on commercial voice APIs and about $0.035 on our open-weights stack. Where the money goes, what you give up, and how to compare quotes.

Eric Segovia

Platform lead

6 min read

Which process do we automate first?

Two discovery sessions, no cost, and you leave with two or three quick wins whether or not you build with us.

We reply in under one business day.

Loading the form